My recent post about got me thinking about Robert Dilts' hierarchical model of 'neurological levels'. I mentioned this in passing in my post on back in the autumn as something I've been thinking about blogging about for ages. Well, the time has come, because I think it offers quite a useful way to think about these 'technologies' from a practical perspective, rather than the theoretical context Foucault was working in. First what this is. The Dilts pyramid is a model of personal change. It consists of a series of levels, each of which is constituted from, while also constraining, the one below. Gainsbourg Melody Nelson Rariti. Hence, your capabilities define which behaviours you are able to engage in, but are also made up from your behaviours to date. Cambridge Consulting Group Bob Anderson Pdf To Excel.

And you only gain new capabilities by engaging in new behaviours. Now, like many aspects of NLP, this model has been subject to considerable critique. In particular, it seems to me that the designation that this refers to 'neurological' levels is under-substantiated at best. The Wolf Of Wall Street Full Movie In Hindi Hd Free Download here. Neurology has come a long way since 1990, after all. The general response within the NLP literature itself seems to be to critique various aspects of the model at a theoretical level, and then say: but it's still quite a useful way to think about this. (Examples of such responses are, and.) So, my instinct is to see this as a model that has been inferred inductively from experience of working with human beings, and as such can offer some useful ways to think about how people learn and how people change.